(original letter available upon request)
November 10, 2025
EXECUTIVE VICE CHANCELLOR & PROVOST
VICE CHANCELLOR ADMINISTRATION
UC BERKELEY CHIEF OF POLICE
Delegation of Authority – Consent to remain on campus
References:
(a) Regents Bylaw 31
(b) California Penal Code Sections 626.4 and 626.6
The central functions of the University are “to provide and sustain an environment conducive to sharing, extending,
and critically examining knowledge and values, and to furthering the search for wisdom.” (Academic Personnel
Manual 015, Preamble.) Critical to the University’s mission is the ability to effectively address, consistent with the
First Amendment, the conduct of individuals that disrupt or interfere with the operation of the University.
Pursuant to Regents Bylaw 31, Chancellors are delegated responsibility for, among other things, the internal
administration, operation, and discipline of their campuses. The California Legislature has codified certain aspects
of this authority, including the authority to order individuals to leave campus for specified conduct pursuant
to two statutory provisions.
Penal Code section 626.4 authorizes the Chancellor or an officer or employee designated by the Chancellor to
maintain order on such campus or facility, to notify a person that consent to remain on campus or at another facility
under the control of the Chancellor has been withdrawn when there is reasonable cause to believe that such person
has willfully disrupted the orderly operation of such campus or facility. This section is primarily intended to address
the conduct of members of the campus community (students, faculty, and staff)1, but it may be used for non-affiliates
as well. This provision authorizes consent to be withdrawn for up to 14 days from the date upon which consent was
initially withdrawn, permits the person from whom consent has been withdrawn to submit a written request for a
hearing challenging the withdrawal within the two-week period, and requires that any hearing requested be held
within seven days of the request. If the notice of withdrawal of consent to remain on campus is issued by an
authorized official other than the Chancellor or designee, a written report containing specified information must be
submitted by the official to the Chancellor or designee, who must confirm the action within 24 hours or the action
becomes void.
The California Supreme Court has interpreted the section 626.4 standards in a manner to ensure its constitutional
viability against First Amendment challenges of overbreadth, vagueness, and lack of procedural due process2. The
level of disruptive conduct necessary to support summary exclusion from campus without a prior hearing under
section 626.4 is conduct, prohibited by other laws, causing a “substantial and material physical disruption
incompatible with the peaceful functioning of the academic institution and of those upon its campus,”3 “when
[summary exclusion is] necessary to prevent significant injury to persons or property ….”4
Penal Code section 626.6 authorizes the Chancellor or an officer or employee designated by the Chancellor to
maintain order on the campus or facility to direct a person who is not a student, officer, or employee of the University
and who is not required by their employment to be on the campus or any other facility owned, operated, or controlled
by the University to leave the campus or facility when it “reasonably appears” that “the person is committing any
act likely to interfere with the peaceful conduct of the activities of the campus or facility,” or “has entered the
campus or facility for the purpose of committing any such act.”5 This provision requires that the individual directing
the person to leave inform the person that if the person reenters the campus or facility within seven days, the person
will be guilty of a crime.
In accordance with your roles overseeing aspects of campus operations and campus safety, I hereby delegate to you
the authority to provide the notice and direction set forth in sections 626.4 and 626.6. This delegation is consistent
with, and expands upon, any authority previously designated to you to act in accordance with these sections.
I also hereby delegate and/or augment existing delegations to the Chief of Police the authority to designate officers
within the police department to provide the notice and direction outlined in sections 626.4 and 626.6.
When the 24-hour review function is initiated under section 626.4, I designate the following individuals to review
and confirm, if appropriate, the notices issued pursuant to section 626.4:
• The Executive Vice Chancellor and Provost (EVCP) or the Vice Chancellor Administration (VCA)
for notices issued by campus officials other than the EVCP or VCA.
For the avoidance of doubt, the authority in this delegation is in addition to all other University administrative
measures available to address individual conduct that interferes with the operation of the campus including, by way
of example, only, 5 C.C.R. §§100000 et seq. (Regulations Governing Conduct of Non-Affiliates in the Buildings
and on the Grounds of the University of California), the Berkeley Code of Student Conduct Code section IV.D.3
and any other sections addressing exclusion from campus areas and interim suspension, University Policy on
Faculty Conduct and the Administration of Discipline, section II (suspension and involuntary leave); and Policy 62,
section III.C.3., UC Personnel Policies for Staff Members (suspension and removal of employee from the
workplace).
Richard K. Lyons
Chancellor
cc:
David Robinson, Chief Campus Counsel
Megan Landin, Delegations of Authority Coordinator
Sharon Inkelas, Deputy Chief Ethics Risk and Compliance Officer
1Penal Code section 626.4 was intended by the California Legislature to apply primarily to students and to provide universities with “a swift remedy,
by means of exclusion from campus, of those students who … engage in illegal conduct, which disrupts the orderly operation of … campus” by “an
alternative, supplementary, and often less onerous procedure than criminal prosecution.” Braxton v. Municipal Court (“Braxton”), 10 Cal.3d 138, 142-
144 (1973), referencing the Senate Committee on Campus Disturbances, which originated the provision.
2Braxton, 10 Cal.3d at 142-145.
3Braxton, 10 Cal.3d at 150.
4Braxton, 10 Cal.3d at 154.
5Cal. Penal Code § 626.6, subd. (a).